I can usually find the humor and fair comment in a political cartoon, even if I don't agree with it.
But Wednesday's image in the Albuquerque Journal of two men robbing a couple at gunpoint and being referred to as "Dreamers," left me and many others puzzled.
As those following the recent DACA immigration debate know, "Dreamers" is the nickname given to immigrants who were brought here as undocumented children and have since grown into working, law-abiding adults. The DACA debate includes proposals to give them a path to citizenship.
Today's cartoon by Sean Delonas was seen by many as both offensive and a mischaracterization of who they are.
It brought swift online condemnation, as well as a note from Editor Karen Moses. See it below:
Political cartoons are often satire and poke at more than one point
of view. I do not presume to know what cartoonist Sean Delonas was
trying to convey in his cartoon that was published in Wednesday’s
But on one level it appeared to us to be poking at
President Trump’s rhetoric by portraying a quaking Republican couple who
were painting Dreamers with a broad, totally false, brush.
that was not the message received by many readers. Instead, many saw an
extremely objectionable cartoon and thought that was the position of
the Journal. It is not.
In hindsight, instead of generating
debate, this cartoon only inflamed emotions. This was not the intent,
and for that, the Journal apologizes. I repeat that the Albuquerque Journal does not condone racism or bigotry in any form.
also want to reiterate that we do not agree with many of the opinions
expressed on the editorial pages, which are intended to encourage
debate. Also, the editorial board decides what to publish on these
pages, and that is separate from the newsroom and its reporters.
Karen Moses, Albuquerque Journal